And finally, the last instalment of the tale of my spring break in Washington, in which I will finally reveal the meaning of the title of that first post.
Where was I? Ah yes. Day three of our immigration seminars saw us discussion what we were going to do with what we’d learned when we got home. I’ve been to a fair few things like this where everyone starts going off on grand sweeping plans that are going to change the world overnight (or by next Tuesday at the latest) so I was somewhat wary of how useful this exercise was going to be. Fortunately the seminar leader was very good at facilitating this sort of discussion and quickly got us thinking about things we really could do, within the framework of what we do already.
One thing that we were going to do there and then was to go and visit Senator Stabenow, one of Michigan’s Senators. We had an appointment with one of her advisers the next day, so the next part of this day was to plan what we were going to say. To this end we had a crash course in lobbying politicians, which was quite fun. Again it was an exercise in curbing our enthusiasm, narrowing down our plans to change the world into issues that the Senator would actually be able to have a say on. I the end we decided to ask about some of the things that we had discussed in the past few days, such as Secure Communities and the DREAM Act (an act meant to help undocumented immigrant children who go through the American education system to not be deported when they leave school).
As well as these pieces of legislation decided to bring up what I thought was a very valid point, that the immigration process needs to be simplified so that less educated people don’t get rejected for minor mistakes. I fully sympathise with this. I have most of a degree and I’m fairly sure that there are mistakes on my non-immigrant visa form, so I’d imagine the full immigrant paperwork is a nightmare. We also received a bit of tutoring in what order we should say things and on how to lobby: “You can demand things and still be nice”.
After this we had a slight change of theme, given by the man with the longest job title ion the world. Bill Mefford, the Director of Civil and Human Rights of the General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church. Bill talked to us about building communities, using an interesting model of simplex and multiplex relationships, i.e. just interaction with people in a very one-dimensional way (he used the example of giving money to the homeless), or actually getting to know people and building relationships. For me it drew many parallels with what we’d talked about regarding charity and justice (see last post). Community seems to be a slightly overused buzzword in both the church and the wider world at the moment so it’s important that we know what we mean when we say it.
We then went and had lunch. Yes, we did get through all that in one morning. Maybe we should have called it Spring Work Hard. For lunch we headed to another Washington landmark, We the Pizza. Very nice pizza indeed.
Our seminar series was at an end, so after lunch we had a closing session when we talked over the past three days and what we all thought of what we’d done. To be honest I don’t really remember that much of what we did in this, I’m just going off the programme I have here. Um…
Anyway, after that we continued with our sightseeing, as well as preparing and rehearsing for our visit to the Senator the next day. However one bit of preparation was rejected. As Senator Stabenow is a Methodist we decided that we would give her a copy of the Social Principles of the United Methodist Church, which is a book of pretty much what it says on the tin. However Dan and spent some of the evening looking through the book and taking issue with some of it, so we set out with an opinionated pencil to produce an edited, less hypocritical version. In particular we felt that the phrase “The United Methodist Church does not condone the practice of homosexuality and considers this practice incompatible with Christian teaching” should not be followed by “We implore families and churches not to reject or condemn lesbian and gay member s or friends.” So we can’t do individually it but it’s ok for the church as a whole to do it? Our pencil went straight through the first statement and all things similar. Unfortunately we were told that we weren't allowed to give the Senator the edited version, so it remains in Dan’s possession. The rest of the book has some very good stuff in it so I guess that was ok. It’s up for renewal anyway so we’ll press our edits then.
Thursday, the day of our visit arrived. Off we traipsed to one of the big Senate office buildings, walked straight passed Senator Stabenow’s office and got lost. Great start. Eventually we found her office and started waiting. We had to wait for a while so got a bit restless, accidently almost breaking both picture and a bookcase. And then came the moment you’ve all been waiting for.
Out of nowhere someone walked out of a doorway and asked “is Allegra Smith here?” It turns out they knew each other, but someone commented on how scary it would have been if it had been them they’d asked for.
“Yes,” someone else said. “What if it had been “Is there a…David Wilson here?”?”
“They’ve got me,” I said. “I knew I shouldn’t have ticked yes to the “are you a terrorist” on the visa form.
Apparently saying things like that in a US Senator’s office is frowned upon.
After they’d bailed me out we went and had our meeting with the Senator’s advisor. It was very interesting and he seemed to enjoy the break from official corporate lobbyist to talk to real people. What he said was slightly discouraging though, as apparently it’s almost impossible to get any legislation like the stuff we were after through at the moment. It was a good experience though and hopefully something more useful can be done in the future. We left fairly satisfied and gave them an (unedited) copy of the social principles, our attempts to accidently give them the wrong one proving useless. At that was the end of the serious bit of our trip.
One last act though. Every night we’d been having short devotions, looking at a Bible passage with some relevance to immigration. As our normal worship at Wesley is on Thursday we decided to go and have a communion service at the Martin Luther King memorial. Quite a unique and wonderful service followed. Apparently you’re not allowed to have alcohol in public in DC, so we used water instead. I promptly spilled it (“Arrggh, I’ve got Jesus all over my leg!”). Dan talked for a bit and we got a second sermon from the quotes on the walls around us. Dan focused on love, talking about the three rules that a few of us have been developing over the semester as what we thought was the heart of Jesus’s message: “Love God, love each other and don’t be a dick.” (You can replace dick with a stronger word of your choice if you want.) I hope MLK would approve.
And that really was the end of the serious bit of our trip. Although I was right in that the specific issues talked about didn’t apply much to me going back to Britain, it was incredibly useful to try and apply Christian ideas to a real issue in that was. I still don’t think immigration is the issue for me, although I am going to look more into what the issues are at home when I get back, but I’m sure I can apply what I’ve learnt to other areas. And I would urge anyone reading this to think about their opinions on any subject, look past the statistics and go and meet the people involved. It helps.
I hope you’ve enjoyed these posts. Please feel free to disagree with anything I say, as I could be wrong. (That doesn't mean I won't disagree with you in return however). Normal, less political posts will resume shortly!
.